AWWTM: The out-of-sight commuters that don’t matter to TfL

The sky lightening, I head for a bridge with a scene that would suit a subtle sunrise photograph, as Big Ben rang for four fifteen.  Bored policemen loiter beside their van, parked in the Westminster Bridge bike lane.  Tired taxi drivers inch across advance stop lines and cautiously through red lights.  A refrigerated truck of fresh Dutch imports — tulips, one must assume — obediently follows the satnav’s directions onto the Embankment.  On the pavement before the entrance to Portcullis House is a man in City of Westminster hi-vis vest, bent on hands and knees with a brush and a big barrel of hot soapy water.  Yesterday’s dirt must not be allowed to stick to the soles of our dear leaders.  And three late-teenaged blokes on BSOs head home from the night shifts, back to their mums’ flats on the housing estates of south London, weaving around the tourist-free zone that is the Westminster Bridge footway.  (And why not? The pigeons can’t call You and Yours or have their say in the Daily Mail letters pages.)

Continue reading at At War With The Motorist…

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: How to make a great street — and why we’ve built so many awful ones

This evening Andy Cameron, an engineer who advised the last government and has written standards for transport and urban design, will join us in the pub to talk about making streets for people.  That’s upstairs at The Yorkshire Grey on Theobald’s Road at 7pm (bar open from 6 with excellent food available).

If you can’t join us, the slides and audio will be online sometime later.  But in the meantime, you can see a talk Andy gave to CABE — not quite the same audience as a pub, so presumably not quite the same talk, but entertaining all the same.  Most interesting, perhaps, is a little insight into why local authorities have been turning our high-streets into hostile motor roads: they mistook the Highways Agency motorway design manual for an instruction book for city streets.

Continue reading at At War With The Motorist…

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: Association of British Drivers “not a bunch of fanatics”

The ABD tries very hard but is often dismissed as a bunch of fanatics and speed freaks (which it is are not) [sic]. — Honest John

The Association of British Drivers — the group that is to mainstream motoring organisations what time cube is to mainstream cults — have made the shock move of saying something that isn’t totally batshit insane: the government should scrap £5k ‘gift’ to buyers of £25k electric cars.

Continue reading at At War With The Motorist…

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: DafT’s deeply regressive fantasy formula

Flicking through Google Reader, catching up, something caught my eye in George Monbiot’s latest:

Cost-benefit analysis is systematically rigged in favour of business. Take, for example, the decision-making process for transport infrastructure. The last government developed an appraisal method which almost guaranteed that new roads, railways and runways would be built, regardless of the damage they might do or the paltry benefits they might deliver(8). The method costs people’s time according to how much they earn, and uses this cost to create a value for the development. So, for example, it says the market price of an hour spent travelling in a taxi is £45, but the price of an hour spent travelling by bicycle is just £17, because cyclists tend to be poorer than taxi passengers(9).

I was vaguely aware that the government had complicated infrastructure cost-benefit formulae that included attempts to put value on people’s time, but I wasn’t aware that they had gone so far as to value the time of cyclists versus the time of taxi passengers.  So I followed the reference #9.  I’ve read some absurd documents in my time, but I wasn’t quite prepared for this.

Continue reading at At War With The Motorist…

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: Ceci n’est pas une piste de bicyclette

Sorry, I failed to post much because I’ve been on the road.  And sometimes the Sustrans paths.

NCN 68 in Kielder Forest, NorthumberlandThis is a forestry track, NCN 68, Kielder Forest, Northumberland.

I hesitate to criticise Sustrans because I know that they are good people, with an excellent idea — the National Cycle Network — and because they make delightful cycle routes when they are given sufficient money to do so.  I don’t want to harm Sustrans, I want them to do more, and I want them to be able to do it properly, with proper funding.

But this isn’t helping:

Continue reading at At War With The Motorist…

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Creationism: not such a big deal in the UK after all

This is another archival repost, originally written on the old blog in feb 2009, during the Darwin 200 celebrations.

For eight years, the United States was the brawling village idiot of the developed world, so far as Europe seemed to be concerned. But in Britain, we are constantly reminded that, in addition to our own peculiar intellectual failures, we are not immune to catching the American anti-reality bugs. Everyone’s favourite example is creationism. Over the past couple of years we’ve had the confusingly named Truth In Science sending creationist DVDs to teachers; dense dentistry students getting in the news for protesting Steve Jones’ lectures; Ken Ham preaching in Westminster; and most shockingly, living national treasure Sir David Attenborough getting sent hate mail from them. And then this week, Christian think-tank Theos press-released another creationism-evolution survey, and all of the newspapers dutifully ran headlines announcing that only a quarter of Britons accept evolution.

If you’ve heard the “creationists are invading” warning repeated enough times, you might not even notice just how ridiculous some of this stuff is. Sure, American fundamentalists bought enough creation museum tickets to pay for Ken Ham to go on a jolly to London. Sure, a few individual halfwits will complain about their sensibilities having been offended, and get a lazy journalist to believe that it is news. Sure, there are even a small number of people in this country so tragically disturbed that they feel they must threaten one of our greatest heroes. There are even a couple of organisations with rich enough benefactors that they can waste the world’s precious resources sending junk mail to science teachers. But to the extent that three out of four Britons are out of touch with reality to the extent of six orders of magnitude?[1] I can’t believe that’s true. And it’s not.

Do you remember the story in December 2007, about the creationist theme park being built in Lancashire? The blogosphere was aghast at how low the UK had sunk. Anyone actually visited the theme park yet? Oh, no, because it still doesn’t exist. The AH Trust, the charity behind the initiative, have a amusing professional-looking website[2] to tell you all about their plans, though. Apparently the £3.5 million aircraft-hanger exhibit will be the “World’s [sic] first 3D Cinematic Hologram Theme Park.” According to their annual report and accounts, the AH Trust consists of an engineer (always with the engineers!), his wife, and their two mates. They have just over 100 grand in the bank. Not being an accountant, I have no idea why all except £461 of that is currently just resting in the donors’ own bank accounts. The chances of such a theme park being constructed are nil, but somehow I feel that the AH Trust has served its purpose, with newspapers and bloggers doing their bit by humouring them.

While creationism in the UK is clearly a problem which needs tackling, I think it is clear that the problem is consistently overblown. To the lazy hack journalist, creation vs evolution sounds like a fundamental issue in culture, society, science and philosophy, that is of some great importance. So any crackpot and his mates down the pub church can say something retarded and get a he-said-she-said write up in the rags. And bloggers everywhere will hail it as another sign of the rise of creationism, and the descent of the UK into an irrational non-reality based world. We all seem so good at spotting, and correcting, the nonsense newspapers write about science. So why is the skepticism not applied a little more widely?

Footnotes

  1. Roughly the difference between the age of the universe, and the age creationists think the universe is. As Dawkins says “that’s a non-trivial error.”
  2. Link removed from the repost because the site is now occupied by domain squatters.

Comments on the original post

Tim That AH Trust website is amazing. They not only have a vision of a Christian Theme Park (please let them have a merry-go-round where you can ride on Jesus, that would be the best) but also run an advertising agency, film studio and day care centre for dementia sufferers. Well no one could accuse them of having narrow interests. 

I know the funding graph on your blog is looking a bit sorry but, AH Trust, if you build it I will come.

Posted at 2009-02-08 16:42:59
Andrew Clegg 

http://biotext.org.uk/

A few days late, while I catch up my blog backlog, but well said. 

Incidentally, the AH Trust website for me just gives some half-loaded holding page, like someone couldn’t afford their domain bills…

Posted at 2009-02-13 11:53:46
Posted in lay science | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: Car-free holidays: Porthmadog by train

A train passing Harlech Castle (2 for 1 on your rover ticket) on the Cambrian Coast line.

The British have a bizarre habit of going on holiday by car, as though rolling down a bland motorway and sitting in smelly smoggy traffic jams to queue for car-park blighted destinations is an attractive way to spend leisure time.  Previously I’ve given a couple of suggestions for really simple inexpensive and fun breaks without a car: the Highlands by bicycle and the Lake District by bus.  Those are great options for lovers of landscape and wilderness.  But what if you have kids to entertain?

How about taking the train to Snowdonia?

Continue reading at At War With The Motorist…

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: Passive driving

“The ideal of the ethical man,” wrote the great Victorian scientist and liberal Thomas Henry Huxley, “is to limit his freedom of action to a sphere in which he does not interfere with the freedom of others.”

At Bath Skeptics in the Pub in April, Ian Walker talked about transport-related (ir)rational behaviour and policy.  One of the ideas he talked about was “passive driving”.  The analogy, of course, is to passive smoking.  Every time a smoker lights up in a restaurant or pub or club, the health and life expectancy of all the diners, punters, and staff around that smoker takes a tiny hit.  And those people get nothing positive in return. In a liberal society, we defend the right of smokers to give themselves horrible slow fatal diseases.  But we expect them not to interfere with the rights of everyone else to their health.  And on the occasions when they can not show that restraint voluntarily, we have to resort to legislation banning smoking in restaurants and pubs and clubs.

Continue reading at At War With The Motorist…

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: @bengoldacre on bicycles

Like my googlereader and my drafts folder, my podcast app has a frighteningly large backlog.  This evening while on random play it stumbled on an episode of Little Atoms from 2008, with Ben Goldacre, in which he talks about the media’s obsession with simple, glamorous and individualistic quick fixes to complex social problems:

Continue reading at At War With The Motorist…

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: Pimp my ride

I did mention that I quit my job six weeks ago, to be a full time bicycle touring landscape photographer for the summer, right?  I’ve been on a short break between tours — a few days to catch up with bike hacking before the next one.

One problem with being a bicycle tourist photographer is making sure you’re at the right spot at the right moment, not rushing off to your B&B or hostel before it gets dark.  For this reason, few photographers would think to work by bicycle, even though it has loads of advantages over the alternatives.

Continue reading at At War With The Motorist…

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: That’s not what I said, say scientists

According to SCIENTISTS, “pollution is not improved by c-charge.”  (“Improved”? These scientists are so sloppy with their language.)

Journalists all over the city are this week reporting that the congestion charge has not reduced air pollution problems in central London, and that’s a fact, proven by science.  (As far as I know, the CCharge was never about air pollution — the clue’s in the name. But it’s potentially an interesting thing to look at all the same.  I can invent in my head plausible hypotheses for why it would improve air quality, and why it wouldn’t, but both would be useless without evidence either way.)

Continue reading at At War With The Motorist…

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: Is this the most car sick town in Britain?

It’s 1.1 miles north to south.  It’s 0.9 miles west to east.  A small and dense market town of just under 7,000 people.  There are a few small villages but also several large towns all around it, many a short hop away on the mainline railway, so its wider catchment population is small.  There is a big Tescos and a little Co-op in the centre.  All the pubs, restaurants and take-aways that a market town needs.  Even a market.

Continue reading at At War With The Motorist…

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Platform one

I wrote this on the old incarnation of cotch dot net in 2008, before it became strictly for photography stuff, so I’m archiving it here.  I wrote it after wasting several weeks attempting to engage with an avid reader of a specific online magazine.

This totally really happened to me. Exactly like this. In a dream that I had this morning.

I was raised in the hamlet of Frunchbridge Henklecombe, Gloucestershire, around ten miles north of the city of Bristol in the south west of England. Small, quiet, triangular in shape and agrarian in nature, the village lists as its distinguishing features an 18th century church tower and an impressive 16th century manor house. The unassuming tower could be mistaken for those in any other English village; the manor house, meanwhile, really is in another village, situated as it is, three miles away in the village of Plunk.

I can hardly call myself a Frunchbridgian after the years I have been away from the West country. But the village and I have never become entirely estranged, despite our first parting ways nearly forty five years ago. Indeed, my last visit but one was twelve years ago to the day.

At the last census, the population of the parish of Frunchbridge was put at four-hundred and eighty-six: just enough to sustain a halt for the stopping trains on the Bristol to Gloucester railway. The village itself is nestled under the scarp face of the Cotswold Hills, some half mile from the station, and, with a largely retired populace, few trains are actually called upon to stop here. Nevertheless, residents fiercely defend their right to stop a train at Frunchbridge should they one day wish to do so.

And so, at three in the afternoon of September 27, 1996, I found myself alone on the featureless down platform of Frunchbridge station, twenty-five minutes early for the stopping train to Bristol Temple Meads. The today of twelve years ago in Frunchbridge was, like the today of 2008 in London, a warm and sunny day with a hint of early autumn in the air. As I negotiate the station’s small green picket gate, the last of the seasonal arthropods form one last frantic cloud, while cows in a balding field tangle themselves in fence wire as they rip long grass from the cracked station platform, and the tall trees of the railway cutting rain a colourful rain through the dusty afternoon light.

As I settled down on the platform’s single bench (“to Derek, who loved to spot the trains”) to retrieve a Chelsea bun from my satchel, I noticed for the first time that a distant mechanical noise has begun to interrupt the still afternoon. For two minutes the sound grew slowly louder, hesitating once, but only for a few seconds; it was moving. It was no recreational aircraft, nor a farmer collecting the hay. The sound was like no rail locomotive, but clearly its source was the railway cutting.

From the shallow curve in the track came the sight of a quadbike. Astride the machine was a man, not seated, but arched over his handlebars as the bike effortlessly bounced along the sleepers, occasionally mounting a rail. The rider was perhaps in his late twenties, clean shaven , and with dreadlocks pushed back with a band. The colour and muscles in his arms betrayed a summer of hard work, the product of which was partly visible before me. For thequadbike pulls a long shallow trailer filled with rusting machinery and rotting wood, of no immediately obvious value to any man. It took a further two minutes for bike, man, and trailer to reach the platform, where he pulled up and killed the engine. Oblivious to my drooping jaw, he turned to me.

“Got the time, mate?”

It must have taken me some time to rediscover speech, for the man repeated his request, slower than before.

“Do you know what the time is?”

“Are you insane? What the hell are you doing driving that thing along the tracks man?” I exclaimed, choosing to ignore the opening question in favour of what I felt was the more pressing issue.

“‘s an ‘andy shortcut,” he shrugged. “Have you got the time?”

“A handy shortcut? You’ll get yourself killed, fool!”

His response to this was to blow some air. “What’re you talkin’ ’bout. It’s a damn lot safer than that road. Bloody farmers don’t look where they’re going, and those…”

“And trains? You know that the fast train comes through at three fifteen?” My own heart rate and blood pressure carried on rising in response to the man’s own complete calm.

“Oh, I see. Like that. Yer one of those Stephensonists. You shouldn’t believe all that rubbish, you know.”

For the second time, speech deserted me, and we stood staring at each other for another few seconds.

“Whatever,” he continued. You got that time?”

Stephensonists? What a … what a ridic…”

“Whatever, mate. You believe in trains. That’s fine. You can spend yer days sittin’ on platforms if you like. Some of us don’t have time for that sort of stuff, but, hey, I’ll respect your right to do it.” He had reached for the ignition key before my wits returned again.

“You. Don’t. Believe. In trains? How can anybody not believe in trains? What a bizarre thing to say.”

“Oh. It’s quite simple, really. The evidence for their existence just ain’t there. Call me a train skeptic if you like.”

“Evidence not there!” I was spluttering like an idiot by this point.

“Have you ever seen a train?” He asked, still calm and straight faced.

“Of course I’ve seen a bloody train, you fool. Everybody has seen trains. Except, apparently, you. Everybody has taken a train, sat in a train, and been deposited, by trains, at point B, having departed point A.”

More air was blown. “An’ thirty-four percent of Americans have been abducted by Aliens. How sure are you that you have seen a train … ”

“I traveled on the train up here this morning. I am one-hundred percent entirely sure that I have seen a train.”

“… how sure can you be of your own senses? Have you ever questioned your own memory? It is notoriously easy to trick, memory is — with suggestion — you know. Especially with all the lies and deception that people use to spread the train myth.”

“Oh. Kay.” By now I was hooked. Clearly insane, the man must have invested quite some time in rationalising and refining this peculiar story. “So what you are proposing is a quite preposterously large conspiracy and mass delusion?”

“Oh, yeah. It sure is a huge industry, all right. Do you know just how much money these new private companies rip off from the taxpayer? How much their directors get in annual pay bonuses? Can you guess at how much goes back to the politicians in brown envelopes? There’s a huge interest in propagating the great train hoax, you know.

“It’s all part of the modern liberal preaching and moralising,” he continued. “Enemies of freedom can’t bear the fact that modern technology has given us personal liberty with the invention of the internal combustion engine and a highly developed road network. They would just love for our lives to run on track, and, if it weren’t for the diligence of we, the defenders of enlightenment values, they would already have their way. Their Luddite ideas would destroy our economy, our quality of life, and our freedom.

“And these poor passengers stand for it, and buy into the train myth to such an extent that they will convince themselves that they really have seen trains, been on trains, even. I tried taking a train once — before I found out, of course. I believed in trains too, believed that they were a good thing, and I was a good person for taking the train — after all, every newspaper, television advert, and man in the pub told me that was so. I stood on the platform at Cheltenham for thirty minutes with three dozen other people. Third day that I’d tried it, an’ all. Of course, the train never came. I watched my fellow travelers, and the pain that they were put through.

“And that’s when one of them asked what nobody had thought to ask. ‘Has anyone ever seen the eight forty-two?’ he asked. One person chucked nervously, others sighed and shook their heads in despair. And I was converted there and then by a train skeptic. ‘I heard that the company makes up the number of trains they own,’ he said. ‘Just invents rolling stock. The eight forty-two almost certainly doesn’t exist.’ And lo, when the train did not materialise, we were shuffled on to a conveniently waiting replacement bus service.”

His silence indicated that it was my turn to speak.

“What kind of man has never seen a train? The tracks weave all through this county, and every county. How is it possible in this age to not have seen a train? Where have you been? Just who are you?”

He seemed to have been waiting for this comment, or something like it, for his response was instant, and, while not rehearsed as such, I was given the impression that it had been said before.

“Oh, time to bring on the thinly veiled attacks, is it? I know the routine that you self-propellationists use. Can’t produce any real evidence for your claims, so attack the person who calls you out. Stifle debate by pretending that the issue is settled and that there is no controversy. If you gang up and shout loud enough, you think you can defend your ill-won territory as representatives of truth and morality. It’s alright, there’s nothing you can call me that I haven’t been called before. Insane, liar, denialist — those seem to be the popular ones.

“Yes, yes, you would be so stuck in your locomotive ways that your imagination would be unable to cope with somebody who sees the world from a different perspective, somebody who truly questions what they have been told, and is prepared to consider the heretical. I know that having your sincerely held beliefs challenged for the first time can be frightening. You’re bound to strike back, and attack the person who questions your beliefs.

“Who am I? I am a free-thinker, an old-fashioned liberal, and a true skeptic. Me mates call me ‘Spiked’.” He extended a hand to me. “Have you got the time? I think I’m late.”

A pulley creaked, points clicked, gates scraped a path through the mud as they closed of their own accord to halt the traffic on the deserted lane. A solitary rusty speaker on a solitary rusty lamp post let out a sharp screech and possessed itself a fruity male voice.

“Please stand clear of the platform edge. The train now approaching… platform one… does not stop here.”

Posted in shit i made up | Leave a comment

AWWTM: Would a helmet help if hit by a car?

The doctor’s representatives BMA and the “Road Safety” charity Brake both say “yes”.  The Automobile Association and the cyclists say “no”.  They can’t both be right.  Unless the answer is “yes and no”.  Find out how that could be so, at At War With The Motorist

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: What is a bicyclist?

A good review of a medical intervention starts by explaining the population being studied.  The Cochrane review of helmets for preventing head injuries in bicyclists explains that its population is the set of bicyclists who sustained an injury that was sufficiently major to make them go to the ER for treatment (and not sufficient to kill them before they could seek treatment).

Continue reading at At War With The Motorist for a discussion of the subtleties of bicycling that were missed in the best research we have on bicycle helmets.

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment