Tag Archives: helmets

AWWTM: Won’t somebody please think of the children?

In December 2005, an article of massive importance was published in the British Medical Journal. Doctors counted up the number of children being admitted to A&E with musculoskeletal injuries (breaks and sprains — many of which would have been caused … Continue reading

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: Appendix: Bad Science Bingo in the BMA’s “safe cycling” pages

This is just a crude brain dump of a post that comes after the serious series — posts one, two, three, four, five, six, seven and eight. Sorry, I just can’t get over these extraordinary pages on the BMA’s website. … Continue reading

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: How did the BMA get bicycle helmets so wrong?

In 1958, the UK licensed a drug for treating morning sickness. It worked very well. The studies all showed that pregnant women suffering from morning sickness received much relief with the drug. Three years later it was withdrawn, but not … Continue reading

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: The BMA, the BMJ, and bicycle helmet policy

The reason I pick up the bicycle helmet theme again this week is that the BMJ is running a sidebar poll of their readers (or, more accurately, of cycling tweeters and recipients of Robert Davis’s emails ), asking whether it … Continue reading

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: Risk compensation and bicycle helmets

Some months ago I left a series on bicycle helmets hanging while I got distracted with other things. We had looked at what the best evidence for the efficacy of helmets in preventing injury in the event of a crash … Continue reading

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: Would a helmet help if hit by a car?

The doctor’s representatives BMA and the “Road Safety” charity Brake both say “yes”.  The Automobile Association and the cyclists say “no”.  They can’t both be right.  Unless the answer is “yes and no”.  Find out how that could be so, … Continue reading

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: What is a bicyclist?

A good review of a medical intervention starts by explaining the population being studied.  The Cochrane review of helmets for preventing head injuries in bicyclists explains that its population is the set of bicyclists who sustained an injury that was … Continue reading

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: Headline figures

In rare events like bicyclist injuries, odds ratios can be used as an approximation of relative risk: that is, how much a medical intervention changes the risk of a specific outcome.  An odds ratio of 0.3 is interpreted as a … Continue reading

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: So what’s the best evidence we have on bicycle helmets?

According to the Cochrane Collaboration — the source that most doctors will go to for their summary of the evidence — it is five studies from the 1980s and 1990s. Continue reading at At War With The Motorist…

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: Killer cures

I know a lot of you find the whole helmets thing — whether they “help” or “work” or not — tiresome and unimportant.  Well tough.  Bicycle helmets are a medical intervention — a special kind of medical intervention — and … Continue reading

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

AWWTM: Helmets and seatbelts

From At War With The Motorist today… From the World Health Organisation’s Multi-Sectoral Forum on Road Safety in China (March 2008), on driving in a country where over a quarter of a million die on the roads each year: Both … Continue reading

Posted in at war with the motorist | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment