<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Joe D &#187; peer review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joe.dunckley.me.uk/tag/peer-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joe.dunckley.me.uk</link>
	<description>The syndicated and amalgamated writings of Joe D</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:04:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Journalology: Peer review in the dock</title>
		<link>http://joe.dunckley.me.uk/2010/03/journalology-peer-review-in-the-dock/</link>
		<comments>http://joe.dunckley.me.uk/2010/03/journalology-peer-review-in-the-dock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[journalology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio 4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joe.dunckley.me.uk/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Academic publishing, and peer review in particular, was headline news in February &#8212; from stem cell researchers claiming that their work was being sabotaged by reviewers with conflicts of interest, to mainstream news noticing the absurdity of the impact factor &#8230; <a href="http://joe.dunckley.me.uk/2010/03/journalology-peer-review-in-the-dock/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Academic publishing, and peer review in particular, was headline news in  February &#8212; from stem cell researchers <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18466-are-stem-cell-scientists-sabotaging-rivals-work.html">claiming </a>that their work was being sabotaged by reviewers with conflicts of  interest, to mainstream news <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8490481.stm">noticing </a>the  absurdity of the impact factor situation.  BBC Radio 4 must have decided  that now was a good time to air an unedited repeat of 2008&#8242;s  documentary <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00ctk01"><span style="font-style: italic;">Peer Review in the Dock</span></a>.  So now  certainly seems like a good time to post an unedited repeat of my  comments from the time.</p>
<p><a href="http://journalology.blogspot.com/2010/03/peer-review-in-dock.html"><em>Continue reading at </em>Journalology<em>&#8230;</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joe.dunckley.me.uk/2010/03/journalology-peer-review-in-the-dock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Journalology: A piece of peer review history</title>
		<link>http://joe.dunckley.me.uk/2010/01/journalology-a-piece-of-peer-review-history/</link>
		<comments>http://joe.dunckley.me.uk/2010/01/journalology-a-piece-of-peer-review-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[journalology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bmj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pubmed central]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joe.dunckley.me.uk/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over at Journalology I dive into the free archive of biomedical literature &#8212; PubMed Central &#8212; and stumble upon a piece of publishing archaeology: an early example of open-peer review.  Read on to find out what it&#8217;s all about.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over at <em>Journalology</em> I dive into the free archive of biomedical literature &#8212; PubMed Central &#8212; and stumble upon a piece of publishing archaeology: an early example of open-peer review.  <a href="http://journalology.blogspot.com/2010/01/piece-of-peer-review-history.html">Read on</a> to find out what it&#8217;s all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joe.dunckley.me.uk/2010/01/journalology-a-piece-of-peer-review-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

